“The complaint alleges that Jones said certain ‘racial groups like African-Americans and Hispanics are predisposed to crime,’ and that they are ‘prone to commit acts of violence’ and be involved in more violent and ‘heinous’ crimes than people of other ethnicities… The complaint also states that Jones said defendants’ claims of racism, innocence, arbitrariness, and violations of international law and treaties are just ‘red herrings’ used by opponents of the death penalty.” – Daily Mail news article.
In my opinion, “liberalism” relies upon bending or ignoring facts in order to accommodate a Utopian ideology, so telling the truth, when it contradicts “politically correct” orthodoxy, will inevitably result in malicious smears, humiliation, and the loss of livelihood because for “liberals”, confronting the facts is not a viable option.
In this particular case, the parties involved took 3 1/2 months to assemble their case, get the wording together for their several affidavits, and to assemble a “coalition” to file a “judicial misconduct” complaint.
As in the Trayvon Martin case, the more cynical among us may be excused for wondering if the forces of ‘progress and reason’ had spent some time shopping around for a slam-dunk case, in order to make an example, and thus terrorize the judiciary into favouring minorities and complying with the politically-correct agenda.
One may also rightly wonder why Judge Jones was so forthright in her comments, made at the University of Pennsylvania law school on February 20th of this year.
I think that in all likelihood, as she was addressing law students at a university, she felt that she was among friends, and “reached out” to her audience with the honest desire to acquaint them with the realities of race in the courtroom, and of the many unpleasant and illogical situations which they would have to learn to deal with.
If so, then she did not realize that race is far more important to some law students than the facts, and that some minority students may be motivated to enter into legal careers with the primary objective of advancing a racial agenda.
She will now have to pay the price for that. And as she has just turned 64, it will probably be easier for her to resign than to fight.
According to her Wikipedia entry, she was nominated to the Fifth Circuit by President Ronald Reagan on February 27, 1985, and confirmed by the Senate on April 3, 1985, at the age of 36.
She is known for a conservative attitude towards abortion, firearms ownership, and the death penalty, and has been frequently mentioned as a potential nominee for the United States Supreme Court.
And, she also served as General Counsel for the Republican Party of Texas from 1982-83 before becoming a judge…
This is a very sad case, but it is also yet another nail in the coffin of the White race unless we wake up, and wake up soon.
See the Daily Mail story here.
See Judge Jones’ Wikipedia entry here.
I cannot find an email address for Judge Jones, but her snail-mail address is 515 Rusk Ave., Room 12505, Houston, Texas – 77002-2655.