The fallout from racial hiring quotas

Toronto Sun
Thomas Sowell: March 17th, 2011

– Professor appointed because of skin colour does more harm than good.

Many years ago, I learned of an episode in the life of a promising young black man that is relevant to things happening now.

He had been educated at a good school, and went on to receive degrees at good colleges and universities. Then he went for a PhD in mathematics at one of the leading departments in that field.

When he encountered difficulties, his professors essentially wrote his doctoral thesis for him. No doubt they felt good about doing something to help a promising young black man, and perhaps took pride in doing so.

But what about his pride? This young man ended up joining an extremist group that hated white people.

Would it have been worse if he had not gotten a PhD in math? Probably 99% of the public, regardless of race, could not get a PhD in math — and yet still live happy and fulfilling lives.

What recalled this episode was the current flurry of interest in a video of a young Barack Obama at Harvard law school praising Derrick Bell, a black professor there, whose writings on “critical race theory” promoted an extremist hostility to white people.

Bell was for years a civil rights lawyer, but not an academic legal scholar of the sort who gets appointed as a full professor at one of the leading law schools. Yet he became a visiting professor at the Stanford law school and was a full professor at Harvard law.

It was obvious in both cases his appointment was because he was black, not because he had the qualifications that got other people appointed to these faculties.

At Stanford, students complained his course on constitutional law was not up to the standards of the other courses they were taking.

Stanford had one of the leading scholars in constitutional law, Professor Gerald Gunther. Bell was no Gerald Gunther.

A hastily-created program of study of constitutional law was used to teach that subject to students who were not getting what they needed in Professor Bell’s course.

When this clever finessing of the problem came to light, the administration apologized — to Bell for the embarrassment this caused him.

They should have apologized to the law students for short-changing them with a professor who was not up to the job.

As a full professor at Harvard law school, Bell was surrounded by colleagues who were out of his league as academic scholars. What were his options?

If he played it straight, he could not expect to command the respect of either faculty or students at Harvard law school — or, more important, his own self-respect.

Bell admitted that he did not have the scholarly credentials most full professors at the Harvard law school have.

Yet it’s worth remembering millions of people have led happy and fulfilling lives without ever being at Harvard or Stanford.

Bell’s options were to be a nobody, living in the shadow of more accomplished scholars — or to go off on some wild tangent and appeal to a radical racial constituency on campus and beyond.

His writings showed clearly the latter was the path he chose.

His previous writings had been those of a sensible man saying sensible things about civil rights issues that he understood from his years as an attorney.

But now he wrote all sorts of incoherent speculations and pronouncements, the main drift of which was that white people were the cause of black people’s problems.

Bell even said he took it as his mission to say things to annoy white people. Perhaps he thought that was better than being insignificant in his academic setting.

But it was in fact far worse, because the real damage was to impressionable young blacks who took him seriously, including one who went on to become President of the United States.

— Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. His website is
See original here.

– I can’t wait to see how much trouble the Toronto Sun gets for running this Black professor’s columns!

Comments are closed.